Discussion:
Microchannels ?
(too old to reply)
Capricorne
2008-04-06 14:28:17 UTC
Permalink
A few days ago, we were talking about dedicated channels to one artist.
The Washington Post has a paper on it today:

Short Waves of Activity in the Satellite Universe

By Marc Fisher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, April 6, 2008; M04

Just as the Eliot Spitzer sex scandal became the ultimate water-cooler
conversation topic -- if only for a few days -- Sirius Satellite Radio
launched Client 9 Radio, a 24/7 all-Spitzer channel, but just for a few
days.

And when the new baseball season got underway last week, Sirius's
competitor and possible future partner, XM Satellite Radio, offered
Play Ball!, a new channel featuring wall-to-wall baseball songs,
readings and dramas. Three days after the channel launched, it ceased
to exist.

Sirius calls its instant, saturation formats "pop-up channels." XM
calls them "microchannels." By any name, they are a reflection of a
changed entertainment and information culture, a recognition that the
American audience is shifting from loyalty toward permanent formats to
sudden plunges into topics and trends that flash onto the collective
consciousness and then flit away as quickly as they arrived.

The two pay satellite companies last month won Justice Department
approval for their proposed merger; the FCC has yet to rule on the
plan.

"The Spitzer story was so in the zeitgeist of the country for a
minute," says Scott Greenstein, president of entertainment and sports
at Sirius in New York. "We try to be the ultimate aggregator."

"There is a massive appetite for what's hot at the moment," says Eric
Logan, XM's executive vice president for programming. "We're trying to
reflect the mood of current culture in a way nobody else can. Right
now, the core appetite is for the presidential campaign, and we have
Fox and CNN channels that cover that, but we wondered if we could take
them deeper."

So XM created POTUS '08 (using the acronym for president of the United
States), an all-presidential politics channel that launched last
September and will continue through this fall's election -- and
possibly beyond, Logan says.

But although Client 9 Radio and POTUS grabbed more headlines than most
pop-up channels, the bulk of the short-term, saturation channels that
Sirius and XM have created have been musical offerings, not talk.

"When you look back, if you're north of 30 or 35, we bought records or
went to a concert and it would move you, and for the next few days, you
really mainly wanted to listen to that artist," Greenstein says.

So Sirius has enlisted musicians such as Garth Brooks, Sheryl Crow and
Jay-Z to "take over" channels for several days at a time, playing and
talking about their music. And the satellite provider has devoted
channels to one artist for weeks or even months -- E Street Radio plays
Bruce Springsteen and members of his band, and Rolling Stones Radio,
which is running now through April 15, was timed to coincide with the
release of Martin Scorsese's documentary about the band, "Shine a
Light."

Sirius is also running Radio R.E.M. through today, coinciding with a
new album and featuring band members introducing their own music and
other tunes they like.

"People don't want to constantly aggregate and update an iPod,"
Greenstein says. "We're creating channels that aren't just jukeboxes,
but are produced artistically, with interviews, live performances and
archived material."

The music pop-up channels are produced with the permission and
cooperation of the artists, and "we work with the artist and their
management about how long they feel they want the channel to be up,"
Greenstein says.

Neither Sirius nor XM will release numbers showing the audience size
for the microchannels, but XM's Logan says that the more successful
short-term formats match and even exceed the audience for some of the
company's most popular regular channels.

Some of XM's most successful microstations have been built around
holidays, such as a three-day Saint Patrick's Day celebration of Irish
music called XM Green, a Labor Day blowout of songs about cars and
driving called Car-B-Q, and a Halloween channel called Igor that
blended scary sound effects with songs such as "Monster Mash" and
spoken-word ghost stories. XM last year added a Radio Hanukkah channel
that had only the most limited of audiences -- and a painfully limited
playlist -- but certainly won points for novelty.

XM just finished a month-long Michael Jackson channel called Thriller
and this week started Strait Country, an all-George Strait service that
will run through May.

Sirius ran its Strait Up channel back in 2006, and of course the rival
services each claim to be the inventor of short-term formats. Sirius
started out with intensive music channels and has branched into a Bing
Crosby Christmas Radio channel and one that played only the radio
dramas written by Oscar-winning movie team of Joel and Ethan Coen.

XM got into microchannels three years ago, when a hurricane took out
power in southwestern Florida and Logan called the radio station he
formerly worked at, only to find that the station was off the air,
muted by the power outage.

"It hit me that we have two transmitters in space," Logan says, so the
company launched Red Cross Radio, which both then and in the aftermath
of the Katrina disaster in Louisiana and Mississippi enabled volunteers
on the ground to communicate with one another and plot logistics even
when power and cellphones were out.

But the short-term format idea really has its roots in old-fashioned
terrestrial radio, in the AM Top 40 stations of the 1950s and '60s that
regularly created themed weekends featuring extra helpings of girl
bands, Motown or a single artist.

The satellite services say that adapting that model helps keep
subscribers feeling that they are paying for something exciting and
unpredictable. But microchannels are also a new way to package
entertainment and information for a society that consumes popular
culture in short but intense bursts -- from espresso shots to text
messages to viral videos, and now to radio formats that delve deeply
into a single artist and vanish before some of us even knew they
existed.


Post a Comment

mallemployee wrote:
The REM and the Rolling Stones stations have kidnapped two of my
favorite Sirius channels (Spectrum and Shuffle). There must be unused
channels somewhere else in the lineup that can be used for these short
term take-overs.
H Glazer
2008-04-07 14:36:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Capricorne
A few days ago, we were talking about dedicated channels to one artist.
Short Waves of Activity in the Satellite Universe
By Marc Fisher
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, April 6, 2008; M04
"People don't want to constantly aggregate and update an iPod,"
Greenstein says. "We're creating channels that aren't just jukeboxes,
but are produced artistically, with interviews, live performances and
archived material."
The music pop-up channels are produced with the permission and
cooperation of the artists, and "we work with the artist and their
management about how long they feel they want the channel to be up,"
Greenstein says.
Neither Sirius nor XM will release numbers showing the audience size
for the microchannels, but XM's Logan says that the more successful
short-term formats match and even exceed the audience for some of the
company's most popular regular channels.
XM just finished a month-long Michael Jackson channel called Thriller
and this week started Strait Country, an all-George Strait service that
will run through May.
Post a Comment
The REM and the Rolling Stones stations have kidnapped two of my
favorite Sirius channels (Spectrum and Shuffle). There must be unused
channels somewhere else in the lineup that can be used for these short
term take-overs.
XM's Strait channel is eliminating US Country (17) for two months. That's
more than a decade of country music pushed aside until June so XM can kiss
the ass of one artist and his management team. No doubt these Strait, REM,
Jackson, Stones, etc. channels get the fanboys excited and generate decent
Arbitron numbers, but Arbitron doesn't measure the impact these paid
intrusions have on the channels' regular listeners. If satellite radio
doesn't have enough bandwidth to let these artiist suck-up channels stand on
their own, they shouldn't be done at all.

Do you have trouble believing that no money is changing hands here, and that
the motivation for Suck-Up Radio is purely to give the subscribers more
perceived bang for his buck?

H.
unknown
2008-04-08 14:03:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by H Glazer
Do you have trouble believing that no money is changing hands here, and that
the motivation for Suck-Up Radio is purely to give the subscribers more
perceived bang for his buck?
I don't know that subscribers in general perceive these channels to be more
bang for the buck, but they are great for marketing. You can get a press
release published about a Strait channel. The media would just yawn at "US
Country". So I think it's more a matter of screw the people who are already
signed up, so long as we'll get some publicity.
Gary Gocek
2008-04-10 02:31:52 UTC
Permalink
Well, if you're subscribing to XM to get country music, you're either a
long-haul trucker who needs the geographic coverage, or you're wasting money
since every market already has a couple of terrestrial country stations.
Sure, XM gives you commercial free music, but even so, I just don't see the
point in paying for genres that are free on multiple stations in every
market. The point of XM, for me, is to get uncommon genres.

The takeover of a country channel by a country artist is just trivial. Most
listeners can't tell the difference between 11, 16, 17 and Strait anyway,
not to mention 12, 13 and 161. The losses of Special-X, World Zone, Ngoma
and On The Rocks (now online only) are much more significant, but XM doesn't
care because everyone still whines about a change to one of 7 country
stations. We also lost the original Cafe to Starbucks which was previously
separate, and yet you're whining about, who, Carrie Underwood? Like, she
isn't still on 50 times a day on the other channels?

Gary
Post by H Glazer
XM's Strait channel is eliminating US Country (17) for two months. That's
more than a decade of country music pushed aside until June so XM can kiss
the ass of one artist and his management team. No doubt these Strait, REM,
Jackson, Stones, etc. channels get the fanboys excited and generate decent
Arbitron numbers, but Arbitron doesn't measure the impact these paid
intrusions have on the channels' regular listeners. If satellite radio
doesn't have enough bandwidth to let these artiist suck-up channels stand on
their own, they shouldn't be done at all.
Do you have trouble believing that no money is changing hands here, and that
the motivation for Suck-Up Radio is purely to give the subscribers more
perceived bang for his buck?
H.
YKW (ad hoc)
2008-04-10 18:15:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gary Gocek
Well, if you're subscribing to XM to get country music, you're either
a long-haul trucker who needs the geographic coverage, or you're
wasting money since every market already has a couple of terrestrial
country stations.
Not "every". For a time, f'rinstance, Los Angeles didn't have a single
country station, FM =or= AM. (Might even still be the case, I'm not
sure.) Big market not to count.
Post by Gary Gocek
Sure, XM gives you commercial free music, but even
so, I just don't see the point in paying for genres that are free on
multiple stations in every market. The point of XM, for me, is to get
uncommon genres.
That's the genius of satellite: you get the ad-free people =and= the
niche-programming people to pay. You may dismiss the half of that
equation you don't happen to inhabit, but those on the other side are
hugely important to the industry's fortunes.
Post by Gary Gocek
The takeover of a country channel by a country artist is just trivial.
Most listeners can't tell the difference between 11, 16, 17 and Strait
anyway, not to mention 12, 13 and 161.
11 and 16, sure -- Highway 16 exists only because Clear Channel put ads
on Nashville. Of =course= there's overlap. It's designed that way. (Ditto
WSIX, as CC uses the same format there as on Nashville, for no obvious
reason.)

If you can't tell the difference between 12 and 13, though, you're not
listening. Old-school twangy country and hard-rocking edgy country
shouldn't be confusing to anyone.
Post by Gary Gocek
The losses of Special-X, World
Zone, Ngoma and On The Rocks (now online only) are much more
significant, but XM doesn't care because everyone still whines about a
change to one of 7 country stations.
By your standards, though, with Escape and High Standards still on the
birds, no one should care about the loss of OTR.
Post by Gary Gocek
We also lost the original Cafe to
Starbucks which was previously separate, and yet you're whining about,
who, Carrie Underwood? Like, she isn't still on 50 times a day on the
other channels?
Lotsa folks complained about the merger of Hear and Cafe at the time --
and they were told by everyone else not to whine 'cos the formats there
were (supposedly) the same, anyway. Formats that seem similar to non-
listeners are often vastly different to those who =do= listen.
Post by Gary Gocek
Gary
Post by H Glazer
XM's Strait channel is eliminating US Country (17) for two months.
That's more than a decade of country music pushed aside until June so
XM can kiss the ass of one artist and his management team. No doubt
these Strait, REM, Jackson, Stones, etc. channels get the fanboys
excited and generate decent Arbitron numbers, but Arbitron doesn't
measure the impact these paid intrusions have on the channels'
regular listeners. If satellite radio doesn't have enough bandwidth
to let these artiist suck-up channels stand on
their own, they shouldn't be done at all.
Do you have trouble believing that no money is changing hands here, and that
the motivation for Suck-Up Radio is purely to give the subscribers
more perceived bang for his buck?
H.
--
------------------- ------------------------------------------------
|| E-mail: ykw2006 ||"The mystery of government is not how Washington||
|| -at-gmail-dot-com ||works but how to make it stop." -- P.J. O'Rourke||
|| ----------- || ------------------------------------ ||
||Replace "-at-" with|| Keeping Usenet Trouble-Free ||
|| "@" to respond. || Since 1998 ||
------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Loading...