Discussion:
FCC head Martin to support merger, with conditions
(too old to reply)
Titanew
2008-06-16 05:07:47 UTC
Permalink
June 16, 2008
F.C.C. Chief Recommends Approval of Radio Merger
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 12:38 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is
recommending approval of the $5 billion merger between the nation's two
satellite radio broadcasters in exchange for concessions that include
turning over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming, The
Associated Press has learned.

That condition -- along with others, including a three-year price freeze for
consumers -- convinced FCC Chairman Kevin Martin on Sunday to recommend
approval for Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s buyout of rival XM Satellite
Radio Holdings Inc. The deal affects millions of subscribers who pay to hear
music, news, sports and talk programming, largely free from advertising, in
homes and vehicles.

Martin's recommendation sets the stage for a final vote on the closely
watched merger, which could occur any time after his recommendation is
circulated among his fellow commissioners.

The other four commissioners have, for the most part, kept their views on
the deal to themselves. Unlike most FCC decisions, there is no clear
indication on how the vote will go.

The proposed merger has been in a holding pattern during an FCC approval
process that has gone on for more than a year.

Martin said the conditions will make the combination of the two companies
good for consumers.

''As I've indicated before, this is an unusual situation,'' Martin said in a
statement. ''I am recommending that with the voluntary commitments they (the
companies) have offered, on balance, this transaction would be in the public
interest.''

The companies also agreed to an ''open radio'' standard, meant to create
competition among manufacturers of satellite radios, according to FCC
officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the agreement has not
yet been made public.

Other conditions are similar to promises made by Sirius CEO Mel Karmazin
last year.

They include a three-year freeze on prices and packages that include
programs from both services, including a so-called ''a la carte'' offering
that would be available within three months of the close of the deal.

The FCC's analysis has gone on twice as long as the agency prefers in merger
reviews, largely because the XM-Sirius deal faces a special hurdle.

To ensure competition, the FCC prohibited the merger of the only two license
holders when it created the industry in 1997.

Martin is recommending approval despite intense opposition from the
land-based radio industry and most consumer groups, who say the deal will
create a monopoly.

The buyout was approved by the Justice Department in March.

The satellite radio deal has drawn an unusual amount of scrutiny from
Capitol Hill, where the National Association of Broadcasters has fought an
expensive advertising and lobbying campaign to block approval.

The buyout received shareholder approval in November. The companies said the
merger will save hundreds of millions of dollars in operating costs, savings
that will ultimately benefit their customers.

Karmazin has pledged that the combined company will offer pricing plans
ranging from $6.99 per month for 50 channels offered by one service, up to
$16.99 a month, where subscribers would keep their existing service plus
choose channels offered by the other service.

Karmazin also said he will allow customers to choose and pay for only the
channels they want. The ''a la carte'' option will require new radios, the
companies have said.

In addition, the companies have pledged to offer radios that are capable of
receiving both services within one year.

An ''interoperable radio'' requirement was part of the two providers'
license agreement 11 years ago, but the companies have never brought one to
market, a point regularly brought up by merger opponents.

The thorniest part of the negotiations was over how much radio spectrum the
companies would turn over to noncommercial and minority broadcasters.

The companies agreed to turn over 8 percent of their satellite capacity,
which works out to 12 channels apiece for noncommercial programmers and for
those who have ''not been traditionally represented'' in radio, according to
Martin.

The details on how this system would work have yet to be worked out,
according to FCC officials.

Both companies have lost money each year since they launched their
satellites, but have not said the merger was necessary to keep them afloat.

Washington-based XM has about 9 million subscribers while New York
City-based Sirius has about 8.3 million subscribers.
vanguard
2008-06-16 18:15:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Titanew
June 16, 2008
F.C.C. Chief Recommends Approval of Radio Merger
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is
recommending approval of the $5 billion merger between the nation's two
satellite radio broadcasters in exchange for concessions that include
turning over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming, The
Associated Press has learned.
That condition -- along with others, including a three-year price freeze for
consumers -- convinced FCC Chairman Kevin Martin on Sunday to recommend
approval for Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s buyout of rival XM Satellite
Radio Holdings Inc. The deal affects millions of subscribers who pay to hear
music, news, sports and talk programming, largely free from advertising, in
homes and vehicles.
Good news, and about time. Get on with it, while there is still
time to preserve free-enterprise satellite radio as an option for
consumers.

Thank God there was no FCC in 1920, or we'd all still be listen-
ing to crystal sets.


Vanguard
Tony Elka
2008-06-16 17:39:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by vanguard
Thank God there was no FCC in 1920, or we'd all still be listen-
ing to crystal sets.
"Herman, if you were an assistant to Thomas Edison, we'd all be watching
gas television."
-- Grandpa Munster
vanguard
2008-06-16 23:53:42 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:39:45 -0700, Tony Elka
Post by Tony Elka
Post by vanguard
Thank God there was no FCC in 1920, or we'd all still be listen-
ing to crystal sets.
"Herman, if you were an assistant to Thomas Edison, we'd all be watching
gas television."
-- Grandpa Munster
LOL.

My favorite episode has Hall of Fame manager Leo Duroucher giving
him a tryout, and Herman hitting the ball (literally) into orbit as a
new erth satellite. Maybe Mr. Pinero liked that show too.
Usenet User
2008-07-01 13:09:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by vanguard
Post by Titanew
June 16, 2008
F.C.C. Chief Recommends Approval of Radio Merger
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is
recommending approval of the $5 billion merger between the nation's two
satellite radio broadcasters in exchange for concessions that include
turning over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming, The
Associated Press has learned.
That condition -- along with others, including a three-year price freeze for
consumers -- convinced FCC Chairman Kevin Martin on Sunday to recommend
approval for Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s buyout of rival XM Satellite
Radio Holdings Inc. The deal affects millions of subscribers who pay to hear
music, news, sports and talk programming, largely free from advertising, in
homes and vehicles.
Good news, and about time. Get on with it, while there is still
time to preserve free-enterprise satellite radio as an option for
consumers.
Thank God there was no FCC in 1920, or we'd all still be listen-
ing to crystal sets.
Vanguard
Bad News for the Consumer. One sat radio company equals a monopoly and
eventual higher prices, poorer service and no choice. My sat radio or no
one else. The competition argument from traditional radio does not hold
water. The original grants of the licenses said no merger. They need to
hold to their original agreements and license grants.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Steve B.
2008-07-02 04:25:03 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:09:47 -0400, Usenet User
Post by Usenet User
Bad News for the Consumer. One sat radio company equals a monopoly and
eventual higher prices, poorer service and no choice. My sat radio or no
one else. The competition argument from traditional radio does not hold
water. The original grants of the licenses said no merger. They need to
hold to their original agreements and license grants.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
I disagree somewhat. Two companies that are loosing money vs one
company that has a chance is good for consumers. At this rate one of
the two companies is bound to fold leaving that half of the market
holding an empty bag. Personally I would like them to give the
combined company x number of years for the existing receivers to be
phased out and then have half the bandwidth set aside in case another
company does eventually want to enter in to the market.


Steve B.
Usenet User
2008-07-03 01:45:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve B.
I disagree somewhat. Two companies that are loosing money vs one
company that has a chance is good for consumers. At this rate one of
the two companies is bound to fold leaving that half of the market
holding an empty bag. Personally I would like them to give the
combined company x number of years for the existing receivers to be
phased out and then have half the bandwidth set aside in case another
company does eventually want to enter in to the market.
Steve B.
Steve,

Of course I completely disagree. The reason they are in poor financial
shape is that they way overspent for talent and programming. Look at
what they paid professional sports leagues, Stern, etc. - Absolutely
nuts. Sirius and XM caused their own problems. Joining together is not
going to stop stupidity unless you get rid of all the existing management.

They both need to file for bankruptcy reorganization. That does not put
them out of business. But the court could order a change as to what they
pay MLB, NBA, NHL, Stern, etc.

Now you did have an idea I would expand on. Consolidate to one set of
frequencies. Put the other up for auction and let someone new enter the
market with the existing sats and make the combined entity give up the sats.

Someone could enter providing a nice basic service of music, talk, news
without all the expensive talent which could work.

UU
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Joel Koltner
2008-07-10 22:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Steve B.
I disagree somewhat. Two companies that are loosing money vs one
company that has a chance is good for consumers.
Not necessarily. The spectrum has plenty of value -- you can darned well bet
that if one of Sirius or XM were to go bankrupt, the spectrum would be bought
up by another party almost immediately, and would -- in all likelihood -- keep
all the infrastructure in place. They'd potentially lose the "big names" like
Howard Stern, but it seems rather unlikely that he was worth what Sirius paid
for him anyway.

Granted, it's impossible to know what would really happen, but letting the two
merge together definitely doesn't seem to be in consumers' best interests.

---Joel
BaJoRi
2008-07-18 14:47:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joel Koltner
Post by Steve B.
I disagree somewhat. Two companies that are loosing money vs one
company that has a chance is good for consumers.
Not necessarily. The spectrum has plenty of value -- you can darned well
bet that if one of Sirius or XM were to go bankrupt, the spectrum would be
bought up by another party almost immediately, and would -- in all
likelihood -- keep all the infrastructure in place. They'd potentially
lose the "big names" like Howard Stern, but it seems rather unlikely that
he was worth what Sirius paid for him anyway.
Granted, it's impossible to know what would really happen, but letting the
two merge together definitely doesn't seem to be in consumers' best
interests.
---Joel
If there were no other available options, I would agree that it is not in
the consumer's interest to let the merger go through. But you have iPods,
commercial radio, cd's, and other choices that compete with satellite radio
AND are actually in a stronger marketability position. What amazes me most
are the obstacles that government officials have tried to throw up, at the
behest of the NAB, leading to this process coming up on two years, while oil
company mergers for multi-billion dollar companies, which most certainly are
harmful monopolies, are completed start-to-finish within 4 months with
barely a whisper of protest from our elected officials.

Loading...