Discussion:
Opie & Anthony Equaling Howard's Big Ratings with Shocking Speed - NY Post
(too old to reply)
Big Poppy
2006-07-04 01:31:00 UTC
Permalink
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI

July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.

The stakes have been raised considerably for those who do the kind of
radio Howard Stern - and now Opie & Anthony - do.

President Bush has just signed legislation jacking up the fines
tenfold for so-called broadcast indecency.

It is Topic A in the radio world, where the cost of pushing the
envelope too far just went from a few hundred thousand dollars to
millions.

Indeed, CBS Radio chief Joel Hollander told media analysts last week
that he was warned not to re-hire O&A even though it has been four
years since their infamous "sex in St. Pat's" contest fiasco.

"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
_______________________________

For complete story, follow the URL below:
http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/radio_daze_entertainment_john_mainelli.htm
Click
2006-07-04 01:53:51 UTC
Permalink
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
Tim
2006-07-04 02:38:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Click
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
Bush *signed* the legislation, exactly as claimed in the article.
Buster
2006-07-04 22:39:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim
Post by Click
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
Bush *signed* the legislation, exactly as claimed in the article.
Don't worry about it... Emu has very low reading comprehension.
media69
2006-07-04 02:51:13 UTC
Permalink
Shrub signed it, so go fuck yourself.
Post by Click
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
bushlies
2006-07-04 03:13:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Click
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
ROFL at liberal agenda. The bill was sponsored by Republican Sen. Sam
Brownback and Repub Sen. Fred Upton, guided through the Senate by Repub
Bill Frist and pushed by right-wing Parents Television Council who submit
99.8% of FCC complaints. Bush gave a whole retarded speech supporting it
then signed it. Now stop lying to promote your non-informed agenda.
BaJoRi
2006-07-04 05:33:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by bushlies
Post by Click
Actually liar it was Congress that passed legislation. Pres. Bush had
nothing to do with it. Now stop lying to promote your liberal agenda.
ROFL at liberal agenda. The bill was sponsored by Republican Sen. Sam
Brownback and Repub Sen. Fred Upton, guided through the Senate by Repub
Bill Frist and pushed by right-wing Parents Television Council who submit
99.8% of FCC complaints. Bush gave a whole retarded speech supporting it
then signed it. Now stop lying to promote your non-informed agenda.
Promoted by the Republicans and the Democrats did nothing to stop it. Both
are to blame.
Johnny Lima
2006-07-04 01:59:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.
The stakes have been raised considerably for those who do the kind of
radio Howard Stern - and now Opie & Anthony - do.
President Bush has just signed legislation jacking up the fines
tenfold for so-called broadcast indecency.
It is Topic A in the radio world, where the cost of pushing the
envelope too far just went from a few hundred thousand dollars to
millions.
Indeed, CBS Radio chief Joel Hollander told media analysts last week
that he was warned not to re-hire O&A even though it has been four
years since their infamous "sex in St. Pat's" contest fiasco.
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern
- David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big
ratings with shocking speed.
_______________________________
http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/radio_daze_entertainment_john_maine
lli.htm
equalling? Half of Stern's ratings is not equal to. Oops, you are a O&A
fan, so that means you are stupid and don't know that.
satanico
2006-07-04 02:46:22 UTC
Permalink
Roth attracted an estimated 63,000 listeners per quarter hour in January,
versus Stern's 277,000 in December.

http://www.cmt.com/artists/news/1525039/02282006/stern_howard.jhtml

O&A double Roth according to your article so guess what? They are 1/2 Stern
and on in 1/2 the ex-Stern markets which makes them 1/4 Stern overall.
All My Shrimp Was Dead and Gone
2006-07-04 04:57:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by satanico
O&A double Roth according to your article so guess what? They are 1/2 Stern
and on in 1/2 the ex-Stern markets which makes them 1/4 Stern overall.
After only one month.

It is entirely possible they will be exceeding Stern's numbers by year end.
y***@my-deja.com
2006-07-04 07:39:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by All My Shrimp Was Dead and Gone
Post by satanico
O&A double Roth according to your article so guess what? They are 1/2 Stern
and on in 1/2 the ex-Stern markets which makes them 1/4 Stern overall.
After only one month.
No, after decades in the industry, and in the twilight of their
careers.
Post by All My Shrimp Was Dead and Gone
It is entirely possible they will be exceeding Stern's numbers by year end.
I wouldn't bet on it, but if they do that for the next twenty years,
maybe they will be remembered for equaling Stern's 20 years on top
instead of their failure on satellite radio.
Major ChrisB
2006-07-04 07:04:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Johnny Lima
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.
The stakes have been raised considerably for those who do the kind of
radio Howard Stern - and now Opie & Anthony - do.
President Bush has just signed legislation jacking up the fines
tenfold for so-called broadcast indecency.
It is Topic A in the radio world, where the cost of pushing the
envelope too far just went from a few hundred thousand dollars to
millions.
Indeed, CBS Radio chief Joel Hollander told media analysts last week
that he was warned not to re-hire O&A even though it has been four
years since their infamous "sex in St. Pat's" contest fiasco.
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern
- David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big
ratings with shocking speed.
_______________________________
http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/radio_daze_entertainment_john_maine
lli.htm
equalling? Half of Stern's ratings is not equal to. Oops, you are a O&A
fan, so that means you are stupid and don't know that.
it's possible Opie's just lying about their ratings again and of course all
the Opie fans believe everything he says....
angel
2006-07-04 14:38:16 UTC
Permalink
On 04 Jul 2006 01:59:00 GMT, Johnny Lima
Post by Johnny Lima
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.
The stakes have been raised considerably for those who do the kind of
radio Howard Stern - and now Opie & Anthony - do.
President Bush has just signed legislation jacking up the fines
tenfold for so-called broadcast indecency.
It is Topic A in the radio world, where the cost of pushing the
envelope too far just went from a few hundred thousand dollars to
millions.
Indeed, CBS Radio chief Joel Hollander told media analysts last week
that he was warned not to re-hire O&A even though it has been four
years since their infamous "sex in St. Pat's" contest fiasco.
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern
- David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big
ratings with shocking speed.
_______________________________
http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/radio_daze_entertainment_john_maine
lli.htm
equalling? Half of Stern's ratings is not equal to.
you are right... half is not equal but since O&A did half... in 1/3rd
the time... that means MORE.
If it takes Stern 3 months to get a 12 share and it takes O&A 1 month
to get an 8 share... do the math little piggys, its not hard

God damn it you Stern fans are fucking dumb
JMiller
2006-07-04 04:59:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
This is my favorite quote of the article:

"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.

What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
y***@my-deja.com
2006-07-04 09:25:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him. They are obsessed with Stern and
are constantly making such illogical propositions so that they can
pretend that they are as big as Stern rather than the small time losers
that they actually are.

They did the same thing when they thought that they had outdone Stern
by going to satellite radio a year and a half before he did. They were
talking a big game about how they were going to be bigger than Stern on
satellite. Then the reality of their failure on satellite radio came
crashing down on them and now all that is left for them is to pretend
that they are now somehow beating Stern on terrestrial radio... even
though he isn't even in that race anymore, and even though the only
reason they are in it is because Stern left it, and because they failed
so badly on satellite.

They just come off as two really sad losers.
Ahmad
2006-07-04 15:24:34 UTC
Permalink
What a fucking joke these two douche bags are. Wow, they beat David Lee
Roths numbers. whopee! Lets see how close they come to beating Sterns
numbers. I read the "highlights" of their show and it seems they spend
a great deal of time obsessing about Stern. They have no clue how to do
anything original. In the meantime I will continue to enjoy uncensored
Stern.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-04 18:09:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ahmad
What a fucking joke these two douche bags are. Wow, they beat David Lee
Roths numbers. whopee! Lets see how close they come to beating Sterns
numbers. I read the "highlights" of their show and it seems they spend
a great deal of time obsessing about Stern. They have no clue how to do
anything original. In the meantime I will continue to enjoy uncensored
Stern.
Die, terrorist.
Rocinante
2006-07-04 16:06:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him. They are obsessed with Stern and
are constantly making such illogical propositions so that they can
pretend that they are as big as Stern rather than the small time losers
that they actually are.
They did the same thing when they thought that they had outdone Stern
by going to satellite radio a year and a half before he did. They were
talking a big game about how they were going to be bigger than Stern on
satellite. Then the reality of their failure on satellite radio came
crashing down on them and now all that is left for them is to pretend
that they are now somehow beating Stern on terrestrial radio... even
though he isn't even in that race anymore, and even though the only
reason they are in it is because Stern left it, and because they failed
so badly on satellite.
They just come off as two really sad losers.
Once again, they owe their careers to Stern.
--
"We speak your names"
"O-Qua Tangin Wann... Kwa-un Sa, Laji-wan"

***@gmail.com
7/4/2006 12:06:19 PM
SapperPest19
2006-07-04 16:41:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
BaJoRi
2006-07-04 16:45:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
SapperPest19
2006-07-04 20:00:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
BaJoRi
2006-07-04 21:10:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) -
Which we know, due to the rating numbers which were a quarter of Stern's,
not all those people listen to O&A. Again, how do you consider pulling a
quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to 90%. Last time I checked a
math book, and it has been awhile but I doubt things have changed that much,
one-quarter equals 25%, not 90%.
SapperPest19
2006-07-04 21:48:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Which we know, due to the rating numbers which were a quarter of Stern's,
not all those people listen to O&A. Again, how do you consider pulling a
quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to 90%. Last time I checked a
math book, and it has been awhile but I doubt things have changed that much,
one-quarter equals 25%, not 90%.
Ok...one more time for the water heads. My initial post was talking
about the 90% of stern's former listeners who did not follow him to
sirius. yqf referred to that 90% as "scraps that stern has discarded
and left behind." My post had nothing to do with how many listeners
O&A picked up. You are making a valiant, yet futile, attempt to shift
focus from stern discarding most of his audience as scraps. I say
"most" but "most" actually makes it sound better than what the numbers
show. You are so desperate to want to downplay O&A's success that you
feel the need to drag them into this discussion. Again, a valiant, yet
futile, attempt. Perhaps you would like to answer a direct question.
If stern 90% of stern's former audience did not follow him, would you
consider that 90% to be scraps that stern has discarded and left
behind?
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-04 22:41:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) -
Which we know, due to the rating numbers which were a quarter of Stern's,
not all those people listen to O&A. Again, how do you consider pulling a
quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to 90%. Last time I checked a
math book, and it has been awhile but I doubt things have changed that much,
one-quarter equals 25%, not 90%.
Well, if you'd read his whole post rather than snipping it at the
point where your brain became full, you'd see he wasn't trying to
correllate anything to O&A.

Slow down, fella. This isn't IM. You can take all the time you need to
make sure you understand the post before you come up with a reply.
BaJoRi
2006-07-05 02:08:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be
equal
to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) -
Which we know, due to the rating numbers which were a quarter of Stern's,
not all those people listen to O&A. Again, how do you consider pulling a
quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to 90%. Last time I checked a
math book, and it has been awhile but I doubt things have changed that much,
one-quarter equals 25%, not 90%.
Well, if you'd read his whole post rather than snipping it at the
point where your brain became full, you'd see he wasn't trying to
correllate anything to O&A.\
His original post he did. Trying to change things after the fact,
not-withstanding.
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Slow down, fella. This isn't IM. You can take all the time you need to
make sure you understand the post before you come up with a reply.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 03:48:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Well, if you'd read his whole post rather than snipping it at the
point where your brain became full, you'd see he wasn't trying to
correllate anything to O&A.\
His original post he did. Trying to change things after the fact,
not-withstanding.
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Slow down, fella. This isn't IM. You can take all the time you need to
make sure you understand the post before you come up with a reply.
Hey, stupid, here is my original post. It is the entire post,
including what I quoted from yqf. Feel free to show me where *I*
mention or even reference O&A. My original post (quoted below) only
refers to yqf calling 90% of stern's former listeners scraps. You
might want to quit wile you are way behind. But feel free to keep
going. The rest of the group enjoys laughing at you.
Post by BaJoRi
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
The Lone T-Cell
2006-07-04 21:28:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Opie and Anthony are making decent ratings gains. But there's no reason to be
surprised that they haven't reached Howard Stern's ratings considering THEY
HAVE ONLY BEEN ON THE AIR ONE MONTH as far as Arbitron is concerned.

In the interest of fairness, if we were wait until a normal radio ratings
period is up for them (3 months), then we can start to make a proper
assessment as to their capabilities to draw an audience. Not after JUST ONE
DAMN MONTH of broadcasting.

The ratings they have accumulated* so far are a strong starting point. And if
you go by trends, the ratings should go up. But the fact that they increased
David Lee Roth's horrible ratings and increased them to a point where we
begin to argue how fast they can reach Stern AFTER ONLY ONE MONTH is pretty
impressive.


* Technically they haven't "accumulated" any ratings. They only have one
rating term under their belt -- ONE MONTH!!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 03:43:46 UTC
Permalink
On 04 Jul 2006 21:28:45 GMT, "The Lone T-Cell"
Post by The Lone T-Cell
Post by SapperPest19
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Opie and Anthony are making decent ratings gains. But there's no reason to be
surprised that they haven't reached Howard Stern's ratings considering THEY
HAVE ONLY BEEN ON THE AIR ONE MONTH as far as Arbitron is concerned.
In the interest of fairness, if we were wait until a normal radio ratings
period is up for them (3 months), then we can start to make a proper
assessment as to their capabilities to draw an audience. Not after JUST ONE
DAMN MONTH of broadcasting.
The ratings they have accumulated* so far are a strong starting point. And if
you go by trends, the ratings should go up. But the fact that they increased
David Lee Roth's horrible ratings and increased them to a point where we
begin to argue how fast they can reach Stern AFTER ONLY ONE MONTH is pretty
impressive.
* Technically they haven't "accumulated" any ratings. They only have one
rating term under their belt -- ONE MONTH!!
I agree. But O&A's numbers (ratings and listeners) are not in
question. I am questioning yqf referring to 90% of stern's former
listeners as scraps.
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:08:37 UTC
Permalink
On 04 Jul 2006 21:28:45 GMT, "The Lone T-Cell"
Post by The Lone T-Cell
Post by SapperPest19
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Opie and Anthony are making decent ratings gains. But there's no reason to be
surprised that they haven't reached Howard Stern's ratings considering THEY
HAVE ONLY BEEN ON THE AIR ONE MONTH as far as Arbitron is concerned.
In the interest of fairness, if we were wait until a normal radio ratings
period is up for them (3 months), then we can start to make a proper
assessment as to their capabilities to draw an audience. Not after JUST ONE
DAMN MONTH of broadcasting.
Agreed. Best to give them at least a year to really size up where
they're going.
Post by The Lone T-Cell
The ratings they have accumulated* so far are a strong starting point. And if
you go by trends, the ratings should go up. But the fact that they increased
David Lee Roth's horrible ratings and increased them to a point where we
begin to argue how fast they can reach Stern AFTER ONLY ONE MONTH is pretty
impressive.
No, only the pests argue that point. The majority of Stern fans laugh
at the thought of them ever equalling what Stern did. Stern is the
Beatles. O&A are the Monkees. Stern is Metallica. O&A are Megadeth.
Stern is Johnny Carson. O&A are Arsenio Hall. In other words, O&A
put up a respectable showing but are nowhere near as meaningful to the
industry as Stern. Not even close.
Post by The Lone T-Cell
* Technically they haven't "accumulated" any ratings. They only have one
rating term under their belt -- ONE MONTH!!
Right. Way too soon for any of these idiot pests to make claims of
Stern-like stardom. Hell, they couldn't even get anyone to play their
stupid mousetrap game a month ago.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:04:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Sapper, here is a paper bag. Get inside of it, then explain your way
out of it.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:24:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Sapper, here is a paper bag. Get inside of it, then explain your way
out of it.
I guess I've given you too much credit. BTW, shouldn't you be writing
another bad parody for your podcast?
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:51:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
Ok...for the slow people....I will explain my post. yqf said that O&A
picked up a few of the scraps that stern discarded. Stern only brought
about 10% of his former listeners. Therefore, he left 90%. [100% (his
total former listeners) - 10% (the listeners he brought to sirius) =
90% (the scraps he discarded)] I was commenting on yqf referring to
90% of stern's former audience as scraps. Nowhere in my post did I
refer to the number of listeners that O&A pulled. What you should do
is sit back and actually read posts for comprehension before you feel
you must jump in and reply. That might help you look less like an
idiot.
Sapper, here is a paper bag. Get inside of it, then explain your way
out of it.
I guess I've given you too much credit. BTW, shouldn't you be writing
another bad parody for your podcast?
Already done for Friday's show, thank you very much. Actually it
wasn't so much a parody as it was a short radio play.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
JMiller
2006-07-05 03:53:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
He's got you there, Sappy. They're not pulling anywhere close to 90%
of what Stern left behind. Not even Sapper math can make that a
reality.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:23:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by BaJoRi
Post by SapperPest19
Post by y***@my-deja.com
Exactly. It's fucking pathetic how O&A try so hard to characterize
their picking up a few of the scraps that Stern has discarded and left
behind, as them somehow outdoing him.
Scraps? 90% is considered scraps now? When you go to a restaurant, do
you eat 10% and throw the rest away? You are an idiot.
How do you consider pulling a quarter of what Stern was doing to be equal to
90%? Christ. Proof positive that they do not emphasize math in our public
schools.
He's got you there, Sappy. They're not pulling anywhere close to 90%
of what Stern left behind. Not even Sapper math can make that a
reality.
Not you too....I never said that O&A picked up the 90% of listeners
that stern left. I was pointing out that yqf referred to that 90% as
scraps. Stern brought 10% of his listeners to sirius. Would you use
"scraps" to refer to the remaining 90%?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 04:45:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
He's got you there, Sappy. They're not pulling anywhere close to 90%
of what Stern left behind. Not even Sapper math can make that a
reality.
Not you too....I never said that O&A picked up the 90% of listeners
that stern left. I was pointing out that yqf referred to that 90% as
scraps. Stern brought 10% of his listeners to sirius. Would you use
"scraps" to refer to the remaining 90%?
Now you know what it feels like to argue with clone fans.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 05:39:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
He's got you there, Sappy. They're not pulling anywhere close to 90%
of what Stern left behind. Not even Sapper math can make that a
reality.
Not you too....I never said that O&A picked up the 90% of listeners
that stern left. I was pointing out that yqf referred to that 90% as
scraps. Stern brought 10% of his listeners to sirius. Would you use
"scraps" to refer to the remaining 90%?
Now you know what it feels like to argue with clone fans.
You mean you actually understood my original post? First a logical
post about O&A's ratings and now this. Tim, you've been taking your
meds, haven't you?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 05:57:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
He's got you there, Sappy. They're not pulling anywhere close to 90%
of what Stern left behind. Not even Sapper math can make that a
reality.
Not you too....I never said that O&A picked up the 90% of listeners
that stern left. I was pointing out that yqf referred to that 90% as
scraps. Stern brought 10% of his listeners to sirius. Would you use
"scraps" to refer to the remaining 90%?
Now you know what it feels like to argue with clone fans.
You mean you actually understood my original post? First a logical
post about O&A's ratings and now this. Tim, you've been taking your
meds, haven't you?
I've been banging my head with a brick in order to understand the clone
fans. I'm guessing I need to hit myself harder.
angel
2006-07-04 14:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
"I've been doing sub par radio for the last 10 years" - Howard Stern
(while discussing his problems with the FCC)

Howard couldn't cut it on terrestrial radio... he said it himself

suck it up moron
JMiller
2006-07-04 15:12:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
"I've been doing sub par radio for the last 10 years" - Howard Stern
(while discussing his problems with the FCC)
Howard couldn't cut it on terrestrial radio... he said it himself
Then why were his ratings so strong for the whole duration of his stay
on terrestrial? And it wasn't HIM doing sub par radio. It was the
idiots who kept dumping out on him every 10 seconds. Good job taking
shit out of context. Meanwhile, Opie is a disingenious piece of shit.
When he's only on satellite, it's "Stern wishes he had our freedom."
Now that Stern's on satellite and they're back on terrestrial, it's
"Stern wishes he had our stations." Hey Opie, does Stern wish he made
your money? I think not!

I fucking hate Opie and may have to start trashing him on my show.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
angel
2006-07-04 16:42:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by angel
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
"I've been doing sub par radio for the last 10 years" - Howard Stern
(while discussing his problems with the FCC)
Howard couldn't cut it on terrestrial radio... he said it himself
Then why were his ratings so strong for the whole duration of his stay
on terrestrial? And it wasn't HIM doing sub par radio. It was the
idiots who kept dumping out on him every 10 seconds. Good job taking
shit out of context. Meanwhile, Opie is a disingenious piece of shit.
When he's only on satellite, it's "Stern wishes he had our freedom."
Now that Stern's on satellite and they're back on terrestrial, it's
"Stern wishes he had our stations." Hey Opie, does Stern wish he made
your money? I think not!
I fucking hate Opie and may have to start trashing him on my show.
go ahead and trash him on your show.. no one listens except for you
and your co hosts... so who gives a shit ?
SapperPest19
2006-07-04 22:37:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
I fucking hate Opie and may have to start trashing him on my show.
Oh please, no. I'm sure he's a big fan of your podcast. <snicker>
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:10:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
I fucking hate Opie and may have to start trashing him on my show.
Oh please, no. I'm sure he's a big fan of your podcast. <snicker>
He will be.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
Rocinante
2006-07-04 16:05:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
DopieAintfunny had no choice. They were forced off free radio because of
stupidity and were forced back on free radio because of low ratings on
satellite. Howard had a choice and maintained high ratings for 25 years
before he chose to left. This time, they got lucky and inherited his time
slot. Who wants to take bets on how long they last? Certainly not 25 years.
--
"We speak your names"
"O-Qua Tangin Wann... Kwa-un Sa, Laji-wan"

***@gmail.com
7/4/2006 12:01:25 PM
angel
2006-07-04 16:55:53 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:05:26 -0400, Rocinante
Post by Rocinante
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
DopieAintfunny had no choice. They were forced off free radio because of
stupidity and were forced back on free radio because of low ratings on
satellite. Howard had a choice and maintained high ratings for 25 years
before he chose to left. This time, they got lucky and inherited his time
slot. Who wants to take bets on how long they last? Certainly not 25 years.
another loser who cant stand how good O&A are doing. if they do this..
they failed that, if they do that... they failed this.

oh and satelite does not have ratings... get with the program or keep
your half wit opinions where they belong, in your ass
Rocinante
2006-07-05 00:32:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:05:26 -0400, Rocinante
Post by Rocinante
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
DopieAintfunny had no choice. They were forced off free radio because of
stupidity and were forced back on free radio because of low ratings on
satellite. Howard had a choice and maintained high ratings for 25 years
before he chose to left. This time, they got lucky and inherited his time
slot. Who wants to take bets on how long they last? Certainly not 25 years.
another loser who cant stand how good O&A are doing. if they do this..
they failed that, if they do that... they failed this.
oh and satelite does not have ratings... get with the program or keep
your half wit opinions where they belong, in your ass
Personal attacks are the last resort of weak debaters.
This is a stern group so all comparisons are relative to his career.
--
"We speak your names"
"O-Qua Tangin Wann... Kwa-un Sa, Laji-wan"

***@gmail.com
7/4/2006 8:29:29 PM
D***@nomail.
2006-07-05 03:18:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rocinante
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
DopieAintfunny had no choice. They were forced off free radio because of
stupidity and were forced back on free radio because of low ratings on
satellite. Howard had a choice and maintained high ratings for 25 years
before he chose to left. This time, they got lucky and inherited his time
slot. Who wants to take bets on how long they last? Certainly not 25 years.
They have no competition in the NY area.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:12:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by D***@nomail.
Post by Rocinante
DopieAintfunny had no choice. They were forced off free radio because of
stupidity and were forced back on free radio because of low ratings on
satellite. Howard had a choice and maintained high ratings for 25 years
before he chose to left. This time, they got lucky and inherited his time
slot. Who wants to take bets on how long they last? Certainly not 25 years.
They have no competition in the NY area.
They are not doing too bad in most or all the markets they are in.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-04 18:47:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
You and yqf keep on harping on how O&A do stupid shit and get fired.
Howard's done stupid shit and gotten fired a couple times, too. What's
the spin?

Howard got fired four years into his career. O&A got fired four years
into their career. Then Howard got fired again after 3 more years. I
guess O&A aren't clones after all - it took them 4 years to get fired
the second time.
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:00:50 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:47:06 GMT, Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
You and yqf keep on harping on how O&A do stupid shit and get fired.
Howard's done stupid shit and gotten fired a couple times, too. What's
the spin?
Howard got fired four years into his career.
Are you talking about DC 101? The station he LEFT to go to WNBC?
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
O&A got fired four years
into their career. Then Howard got fired again after 3 more years. I
guess O&A aren't clones after all - it took them 4 years to get fired
the second time.
Here's an IQ quiz for you...see if you can spot the difference (answer
on bottom)









































ANSWER:

Stern got fired because of a dispute with the guy who ran WNBC where
he leaped into a new job within three months at a tremendous raise.
O&A got fired for gross malfeasance, then got some shit job at XM for
two years at a fraction of what they made at WNEW before they were
ever asked back to CBS.

In other words, Stern got fired up. O&A got fired down.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-05 10:52:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:47:06 GMT, Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by JMiller
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is! Howard Stern cut it for 25 years
on regulated radio and managed to stay employed the whole time. God,
does this douchebag ever listen to the shit he says? I've never met
the guy but I fucking hate him already.
You and yqf keep on harping on how O&A do stupid shit and get fired.
Howard's done stupid shit and gotten fired a couple times, too. What's
the spin?
Howard got fired four years into his career.
Are you talking about DC 101? The station he LEFT to go to WNBC?
Revisionist history? Google "June 29, 1982 Howard Stern fired"
(without the quotes).
Post by JMiller
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
O&A got fired four years
into their career. Then Howard got fired again after 3 more years. I
guess O&A aren't clones after all - it took them 4 years to get fired
the second time.
Here's an IQ quiz for you...see if you can spot the difference (answer
on bottom)
Stern got fired because of a dispute with the guy who ran WNBC where
he leaped into a new job within three months at a tremendous raise.
O&A got fired for gross malfeasance, then got some shit job at XM for
two years at a fraction of what they made at WNEW before they were
ever asked back to CBS.
In other words, Stern got fired up. O&A got fired down.
O&A were one market sensations in Boston when they got fired from
WAAF. Moving to WNEW in NYC and being syndicated to over 20 markets is
getting fired down?

And I'll just say we agree to disagree on whether going to XM was a
step up or down.

SapperPest19
2006-07-04 22:00:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
I believe Opie was referring to stern's interview with 60 Minutes when
stern said I've been doing subpar radio for the last 10 years." I do
not remember the interview too well. If someone has it and would like
to post it, feel free. Perhaps stern blamed the FCC for the subpar
radio. That might have been the reason for Opie's comment. Just a
thought.
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:09:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
I believe Opie was referring to stern's interview with 60 Minutes when
stern said I've been doing subpar radio for the last 10 years." I do
not remember the interview too well. If someone has it and would like
to post it, feel free. Perhaps stern blamed the FCC for the subpar
radio. That might have been the reason for Opie's comment. Just a
thought.
No, the reason for Opie's comment is that he's a complete jealous
dickbag.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:29:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
I believe Opie was referring to stern's interview with 60 Minutes when
stern said I've been doing subpar radio for the last 10 years." I do
not remember the interview too well. If someone has it and would like
to post it, feel free. Perhaps stern blamed the FCC for the subpar
radio. That might have been the reason for Opie's comment. Just a
thought.
No, the reason for Opie's comment is that he's a complete jealous
dickbag.
Opie is a dickhead. But stern did say he had been doing subpar radio.
What reason did he give for his subpar radio?
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:39:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
I believe Opie was referring to stern's interview with 60 Minutes when
stern said I've been doing subpar radio for the last 10 years." I do
not remember the interview too well. If someone has it and would like
to post it, feel free. Perhaps stern blamed the FCC for the subpar
radio. That might have been the reason for Opie's comment. Just a
thought.
No, the reason for Opie's comment is that he's a complete jealous
dickbag.
Opie is a dickhead. But stern did say he had been doing subpar radio.
What reason did he give for his subpar radio?
FCC restrictions and a hair trigger dump button operator.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 05:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
I believe Opie was referring to stern's interview with 60 Minutes when
stern said I've been doing subpar radio for the last 10 years." I do
not remember the interview too well. If someone has it and would like
to post it, feel free. Perhaps stern blamed the FCC for the subpar
radio. That might have been the reason for Opie's comment. Just a
thought.
No, the reason for Opie's comment is that he's a complete jealous
dickbag.
Opie is a dickhead. But stern did say he had been doing subpar radio.
What reason did he give for his subpar radio?
FCC restrictions and a hair trigger dump button operator.
And that's why Opie said what he said.
JMiller
2006-07-05 07:39:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
No, the reason for Opie's comment is that he's a complete jealous
dickbag.
Opie is a dickhead. But stern did say he had been doing subpar radio.
What reason did he give for his subpar radio?
FCC restrictions and a hair trigger dump button operator.
And that's why Opie said what he said.
Ah, but the difference is that Stern doesn't HAVE to do a censored
show anymore. Stern is at Sirius because he WANTS to be there. Stern
spent the last two years doing a heavily censored show just fine and
got great ratings on top of it. But he hated it. So he left and got
an amazing boost in pay to boot. If O&A could have good money at XM,
there's no way in fucking hell they would have ever gone back to
terrestrial. There is not one adult comedy radio host in the world
doing a heavily censored broadcast that wouldn't rather be uncensored.
Therefore, Opie is a lying, disingenious assfuck.

---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show for those who think Opie and Anthony aren't stupid enough.
Buster
2006-07-04 22:43:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
"Howard Stern showed he can't cut it on regulated radio. We can," says
Opie.
What a fucking cretin this Opie is!
You got that right. Opie, that fucking drinkie bastard, is lucky to
still be in radio. If he hadn't had the good fortune to meet Anthony
and have him on his WBAB show 10 years ago, he's be an insurance
salesman on Long Island right now.
y***@my-deja.com
2006-07-04 05:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.
The stakes have been raised considerably for those who do the kind of
radio Howard Stern - and now Opie & Anthony - do.
President Bush has just signed legislation jacking up the fines
tenfold for so-called broadcast indecency.
It is Topic A in the radio world, where the cost of pushing the
envelope too far just went from a few hundred thousand dollars to
millions.
Indeed, CBS Radio chief Joel Hollander told media analysts last week
that he was warned not to re-hire O&A even though it has been four
years since their infamous "sex in St. Pat's" contest fiasco.
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
Oops. You accidentally left out the next sentence of the article which
said:

"Now appearing on Free FM (92.3), the rowdy twosome - accompanied by
earthy comedian Jim Norton - doubled Roth's final ratings, according to
interim Arbitron reports."

So what Mainelli falsely characterized as "equaling Howard's final big
ratings" in reality is only a doubling of David Lee Roth's ratings,
which is nowhere near equal to Stern's final ratings.
Matt Mac Donagh
2006-07-04 05:07:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
Richard
2006-07-04 13:18:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.

NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.

Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
angel
2006-07-04 14:49:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs

the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.

hurts doesn't it ?
JMiller
2006-07-04 15:15:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
Post by angel
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
No.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
angel
2006-07-04 16:52:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
No, but you are right. the info I was going on was a mistake on my
part. As of April 3rd XM had 6.5 million. they estimate the year end
to over 8 million.

my mistake
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-04 18:56:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
Post by JMiller
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
No, but you are right. the info I was going on was a mistake on my
part. As of April 3rd XM had 6.5 million. they estimate the year end
to over 8 million.
my mistake
How many figures in 6.5 million?
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:02:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by angel
Post by JMiller
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
No, but you are right. the info I was going on was a mistake on my
part. As of April 3rd XM had 6.5 million. they estimate the year end
to over 8 million.
my mistake
Yes it was. Now add where XM had to lower their year end expectations
by half a million because of low sales this year.
Post by Tim Donohoe
How many figures in 6.5 million?
Angel says 2!
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-04 22:39:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
It's howie math? Like stern talking about the 4 million people on
sirius.
JMiller
2006-07-05 04:11:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
It's howie math? Like stern talking about the 4 million people on
sirius.
Except the 4 million people on Sirius are already there.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:30:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by JMiller
Post by SapperPest19
Post by JMiller
How does XM have 8 million subs when they said last quarter they only
had 6.5 million? Did they pick up 1.5 million this quarter? Of
course not, idiot. Once again, you prove you can't do simple math.
It's howie math? Like stern talking about the 4 million people on
sirius.
Except the 4 million people on Sirius are already there.
I'm referring to when sirius had 2.5 million or so, maybe 3 million.
Matt Mac Donagh
2006-07-04 15:43:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.

I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that post
to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother? I wouldn't care if I
was the only one listening to him. I'm happy with the show and thats all I
care about.

Matt
Fogerty
2006-07-04 15:51:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.
I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that post
to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother? I wouldn't care if I
was the only one listening to him. I'm happy with the show and thats all I
care about.
Matt
Don'y you know better than to provide a lucide, logical answer in this
group?? Shame on you.
Fogerty
2006-07-04 15:52:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fogerty
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.
I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that
post to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother? I wouldn't
care if I was the only one listening to him. I'm happy with the show
and thats all I care about.
Matt
Don'y you know better than to provide a lucide, logical answer in this
group?? Shame on you.
should be "lucid" not "lucide"
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-04 18:05:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fogerty
Post by Fogerty
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.
I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that
post to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother? I wouldn't
care if I was the only one listening to him. I'm happy with the show
and thats all I care about.
Matt
Don'y you know better than to provide a lucide, logical answer in this
group?? Shame on you.
should be "lucid" not "lucide"
But "Don'y" is OK?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-04 18:57:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Fogerty
Post by Fogerty
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.
I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that
post to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother? I wouldn't
care if I was the only one listening to him. I'm happy with the show
and thats all I care about.
Matt
Don'y you know better than to provide a lucide, logical answer in this
group?? Shame on you.
should be "lucid" not "lucide"
But "Don'y" is OK?
its short for "Don'yaknow"
angel
2006-07-04 16:53:05 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:43:45 -0600, "Matt Mac Donagh"
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
So out of 8 million people only 6 people tune into them? Thats not good.
I dont give a fuck either way but am amazed by the Howard haters that post
to a Howard fan group all the time. Why do you bother?
cuz it bothers you
Matt Mac Donagh
2006-07-05 06:04:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
cuz it bothers you
Wrong.. Doesn't bother me in the least.

Matt
Matt Mac Donagh
2006-07-04 15:48:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
hurts doesn't it ?
And why would you think that anyone would be physically pained by something
as stupid as a radio show. Your a tard and so are the rest of the O&A fans
that come here just to get a rise out of people. Get a clue. WE DONT CARE!

Another one for the KF....

Matt
angel
2006-07-04 16:53:28 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:48:37 -0600, "Matt Mac Donagh"
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
hurts doesn't it ?
And why would you think that anyone would be physically pained by something
as stupid as a radio show. Your a tard and so are the rest of the O&A fans
that come here just to get a rise out of people. Get a clue. WE DONT CARE!
yes you do
Matt Mac Donagh
2006-07-05 06:06:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:48:37 -0600, "Matt Mac Donagh"
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
hurts doesn't it ?
And why would you think that anyone would be physically pained by something
as stupid as a radio show. Your a tard and so are the rest of the O&A fans
that come here just to get a rise out of people. Get a clue. WE DONT CARE!
yes you do
In your stupid little world maybe. If that makes you feel better go ahead
and think it.

Dont forget to take your meds today.

Matt
JMiller
2006-07-05 07:27:42 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 00:06:01 -0600, "Matt Mac Donagh"
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:48:37 -0600, "Matt Mac Donagh"
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by angel
hurts doesn't it ?
And why would you think that anyone would be physically pained by something
as stupid as a radio show. Your a tard and so are the rest of the O&A fans
that come here just to get a rise out of people. Get a clue. WE DONT CARE!
yes you do
In your stupid little world maybe. If that makes you feel better go ahead
and think it.
Dont forget to take your meds today.
I have to tell you that I do care. And it does piss me off when idiot
pests come in here and start spouting bullshit about their lame
heroes. The reason is that being a musician, I respect the shit out
of the musicians I loved when I was starting out. Most musicians I
know are the same way.

Opie and Anthony loved and respected Howard Stern so much that they
started a radio show that emulated what Stern did. They have even
said so themselves. So being the dutiful Stern worshippers they were,
they did exactly what Howard did with Imus and the Philly Zookeeper
DiBella and started trashing their hero, Howard Stern. But what they
forgot was that Stern had real issues with Imus and DiBella,
especially Imus. Imus was a real prick to Howard and Robin, and
DiBella kept telling everyone that Stern was a nobody who could never
beat him. But O&A had no real issue with Stern. They just bashed him
because he made lots of money and enjoyed it a little too much for
their liking.

So they are phonies and lying assholes. Never would I trash the
heroes of my youth that made me want to play music. OK, so I gave
Paul McCartney a little shit on one of my shows, but it was more
directed at his ex-wife. So yeah, it bothers me when I see those smug
fucking assholes take shits on the guy who made it possible for them
to get 7-figure salaries instead of playing records for $600 a week.

And these moron zit-faced teenagers who stick up for them and whine
about how Stern had them gagged like they didn't deserve it are so
fucking clueless about concepts like respect because they think the
world owes them a fucking living are the exact fanbase that O&A appeal
to. "We should be able to do whatever the fuck we want, shit on
whoever the fuck we want, and you should give us exactly what we want
when we demand it," these cretinous dipshits shout. And when the
world ignores them, they lash out like babies, just like their heroes,
Opie and Anthony.

So yeah, they piss me off. Fortunately, their kind always ends up
either learning their lessons the hard way and shaping up, or they end
up being ugly, bitter, confused, and angry adult assholes like Lloyd
the Wifebeating Pest.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show for those who think Opie and Anthony aren't stupid enough.
Rocinante
2006-07-04 16:10:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
Even Opie said on one of their shows that only 1% of the total subs listen
to the show.
--
"We speak your names"
"O-Qua Tangin Wann... Kwa-un Sa, Laji-wan"

***@gmail.com
7/4/2006 12:09:36 PM
angel
2006-07-04 16:57:27 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:10:16 -0400, Rocinante
Post by Rocinante
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
Even Opie said on one of their shows that only 1% of the total subs listen
to the show.
uh... no, no he didnt. But it would take a non-listener to provide an
accurate quote wouldn't it ?

They are in the top 5 most listened to programs on XM... even Howie
cant top that.
Rocinante
2006-07-05 00:19:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:10:16 -0400, Rocinante
Post by Rocinante
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
Even Opie said on one of their shows that only 1% of the total subs listen
to the show.
uh... no, no he didnt. But it would take a non-listener to provide an
accurate quote wouldn't it ?
They are in the top 5 most listened to programs on XM... even Howie
cant top that.
Yes he did on the Jan. 19, 2005 show.
--
"We speak your names"
"O-Qua Tangin Wann... Kwa-un Sa, Laji-wan"

***@gmail.com
7/4/2006 8:18:49 PM
JMiller
2006-07-05 03:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by angel
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 12:10:16 -0400, Rocinante
Post by Rocinante
Post by angel
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
yeah no one listens to them... except around 6 of the 8 + million XM
subs
the only people who "don't give a shit" and yet somehow do give a
shit... are you silly little Howie fans.
hurts doesn't it ?
Even Opie said on one of their shows that only 1% of the total subs listen
to the show.
uh... no, no he didnt. But it would take a non-listener to provide an
accurate quote wouldn't it ?
They are in the top 5 most listened to programs on XM... even Howie
cant top that.
Alright you lying fuck...provide proof of that statement. You're
talking out of your ass. As usual. 6 out of the 8+ million XM subs
when XM only has 6.5 million, right? Stop being a dumbass.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
BaJoRi
2006-07-04 16:13:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richard
Post by Matt Mac Donagh
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
Where does it say anything about ratings? And why should we care?
I find it quite interesting that the ONLY time I ever hear anything about these
"amazing talents" is right here on a Stern newgroup.
NEVER in the media. NEVER anywhere else. Yep. They're on a big upward career
being on free radio since nobody would pay for them on XM.
I have to say this isn't true. While watching TLC with my so the other day,
the top 20 Supervillains of all time, O&A were commentators: giving their
opinion about the television series Joker and whether or not the Terminator
should have been made a good guy for the second movie....
Post by Richard
Good luck, boys. Nobody gives a shit.
Scott en Aztlán
2006-07-04 22:32:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
OPIE & ANTHONY DODGE MILLION-DOLLAR TROUBLE AND GHOST OF STERN
By JOHN MAINELLI
July 3, 2006 -- 'THE next time we get fired will be it for the Opie &
Anthony show," says Gregg "Opie" Hughes.
Well, at least they recognize that it's inevitable.
--
F Joey Booze!
Buster
2006-07-04 22:38:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.

BTW... let's not forget that the NY Post hates Stern and will stick it
to him any chance they get.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-05 00:08:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
BTW... let's not forget that the NY Post hates Stern and will stick it
to him any chance they get.
Are you nuts? The Post is the paper that slams O&A every chance they
get. "Dopey Opie & Pervy Pal" ring any bells?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 00:41:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
Do they have to share their ratings with the guys in the 9-11 slot on
92.3? If they do, that will kill their ratings. These guys were worse
than DLR, they were so bad that they weren't even considered
replacements for him (and his 1 share) in the mornings. DLR was bad, but
putting those 2 retards on the radio and expecting someone to listen is
an insult to radio listeners. If their ratings are a combination of the
entire 6-11 timeslot they are working with a zero mixed into their average.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-05 01:22:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
Do they have to share their ratings with the guys in the 9-11 slot on
92.3? If they do, that will kill their ratings. These guys were worse
than DLR, they were so bad that they weren't even considered
replacements for him (and his 1 share) in the mornings. DLR was bad, but
putting those 2 retards on the radio and expecting someone to listen is
an insult to radio listeners. If their ratings are a combination of the
entire 6-11 timeslot they are working with a zero mixed into their average.
Unfortunately, yes. Arbitron only rates by dayparts, regardless of the
content. 6AM-10AM is a daypart that O&A leave at 9AM, relinquishing
the console to JV & Elvis.

JV & Elvis have spent much of their time on-air since O&A came back
bitching that management won't help sponsor a comedy tour like O&A are
promoting right now with CBS. When was the last time you heard Norton,
Vos, Burr, Oneal (yes, no apostrophe - the brother ain't Irish),
Saget, Ralphie May, Bob Kelly, Dom Irrera or Tracy Morgan on JV &
Elvis's show?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 01:25:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
Do they have to share their ratings with the guys in the 9-11 slot on
92.3? If they do, that will kill their ratings. These guys were worse
than DLR, they were so bad that they weren't even considered
replacements for him (and his 1 share) in the mornings. DLR was bad, but
putting those 2 retards on the radio and expecting someone to listen is
an insult to radio listeners. If their ratings are a combination of the
entire 6-11 timeslot they are working with a zero mixed into their average.
Unfortunately, yes. Arbitron only rates by dayparts, regardless of the
content. 6AM-10AM is a daypart that O&A leave at 9AM, relinquishing
the console to JV & Elvis.
O&A are screwed, they can get a 10 share and these annoying
embarassments will surely drag them down 25% with their zero rating.
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
JV & Elvis have spent much of their time on-air since O&A came back
bitching that management won't help sponsor a comedy tour like O&A are
promoting right now with CBS. When was the last time you heard Norton,
Vos, Burr, Oneal (yes, no apostrophe - the brother ain't Irish),
Saget, Ralphie May, Bob Kelly, Dom Irrera or Tracy Morgan on JV &
Elvis's show?
A real comedian would sit there stunned at their lame attempt to be
funny, it would be a full hour of douche chills trying to hide the
embarassment of being heard on their show. Patrice Oneal needs to do
their show and straighten this whole mess out before they rent
apartments in NYC.
BaJoRi
2006-07-05 02:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
Do they have to share their ratings with the guys in the 9-11 slot on
92.3? If they do, that will kill their ratings. These guys were worse
than DLR, they were so bad that they weren't even considered replacements
for him (and his 1 share) in the mornings. DLR was bad, but putting those
2 retards on the radio and expecting someone to listen is an insult to
radio listeners. If their ratings are a combination of the entire 6-11
timeslot they are working with a zero mixed into their average.
Unfortunately, yes. Arbitron only rates by dayparts, regardless of the
content. 6AM-10AM is a daypart that O&A leave at 9AM, relinquishing
the console to JV & Elvis.
O&A are screwed, they can get a 10 share and these annoying embarassments
will surely drag them down 25% with their zero rating.
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher? If you care to remember, and I am sur eyou
don't, Howard was at the same disadvantage, as he usually did end his show
at 10 or half-past-ten, leaving a significant amount of time that received
ratings where he was not under control.


I am just utterly amazed at the amount of excuses coming from O&A fans, and
how they spout about how wonderful the two are doing, and how they are so
much better than Stern, etc., but they always slide in those excuses.
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
JV & Elvis have spent much of their time on-air since O&A came back
bitching that management won't help sponsor a comedy tour like O&A are
promoting right now with CBS. When was the last time you heard Norton,
Vos, Burr, Oneal (yes, no apostrophe - the brother ain't Irish),
Saget, Ralphie May, Bob Kelly, Dom Irrera or Tracy Morgan on JV &
Elvis's show?
A real comedian would sit there stunned at their lame attempt to be funny,
it would be a full hour of douche chills trying to hide the embarassment
of being heard on their show. Patrice Oneal needs to do their show and
straighten this whole mess out before they rent apartments in NYC.
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 04:26:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 04:36:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
I honestly thought someone must have gotten on your computer while you
were gone. Same NNTP Posting Host but you were using logic with the
ratings thing. But it is funny to see a stern fan attack a stern fan
because he used logic.
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 04:52:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
I honestly thought someone must have gotten on your computer while you
were gone. Same NNTP Posting Host but you were using logic with the
ratings thing. But it is funny to see a stern fan attack a stern fan
because he used logic.
Yeah we hate that here at stern central. Go clone something.
SapperPest19
2006-07-05 05:44:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
I honestly thought someone must have gotten on your computer while you
were gone. Same NNTP Posting Host but you were using logic with the
ratings thing. But it is funny to see a stern fan attack a stern fan
because he used logic.
Yeah we hate that here at stern central. Go clone something.
I've been thinking of getting into podcasting so I've been downloading
JMiller's shows. I just don't know any old Sha-na-na guys whose name I
can drop to impress people. Then I have to find a black guy who want's
to be on mic.
JMiller
2006-07-05 05:47:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
I honestly thought someone must have gotten on your computer while you
were gone. Same NNTP Posting Host but you were using logic with the
ratings thing. But it is funny to see a stern fan attack a stern fan
because he used logic.
Yeah we hate that here at stern central. Go clone something.
I've been thinking of getting into podcasting so I've been downloading
JMiller's shows. I just don't know any old Sha-na-na guys whose name I
can drop to impress people. Then I have to find a black guy who want's
to be on mic.
You should make sure everyone on your show can sing and play an
instrument, too.

Hey, there you go...you think we're clones of O&A? Which one sings,
which one plays guitar, and which one plays drums?
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show that keeps you regular.
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 06:03:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
I've been thinking of getting into podcasting so I've been downloading
JMiller's shows. I just don't know any old Sha-na-na guys whose name I
can drop to impress people. Then I have to find a black guy who want's
to be on mic.
I'm black, but I have a terrible stutter and a french accent. I'll be
ready to do your show next week after I get a few things shined. Better
hurry before freewings and hotsauce snap me up.
JMiller
2006-07-05 07:40:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by SapperPest19
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by BaJoRi
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher?
blah blah blah, shut the fuck up. I was just making conversation.
Google my recent posts if you consider me a clone fan.
I honestly thought someone must have gotten on your computer while you
were gone. Same NNTP Posting Host but you were using logic with the
ratings thing. But it is funny to see a stern fan attack a stern fan
because he used logic.
Yeah we hate that here at stern central. Go clone something.
I've been thinking of getting into podcasting so I've been downloading
JMiller's shows. I just don't know any old Sha-na-na guys whose name I
can drop to impress people.
Try Chico the bass player. He's dead now so nobody could prove that
you don't know him.
Post by SapperPest19
Then I have to find a black guy who want's to be on mic.
Easier said than done, my friend.
---
The Big Ass Broadcast
www.bigassbroadcast.com
The internet radio show for those who think Opie and Anthony aren't stupid enough.
Schwoogie Johnson
2006-07-05 10:39:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by BaJoRi
Post by Schwoogie Johnson
Post by Tim Donohoe
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
Do they have to share their ratings with the guys in the 9-11 slot on
92.3? If they do, that will kill their ratings. These guys were worse
than DLR, they were so bad that they weren't even considered replacements
for him (and his 1 share) in the mornings. DLR was bad, but putting those
2 retards on the radio and expecting someone to listen is an insult to
radio listeners. If their ratings are a combination of the entire 6-11
timeslot they are working with a zero mixed into their average.
Unfortunately, yes. Arbitron only rates by dayparts, regardless of the
content. 6AM-10AM is a daypart that O&A leave at 9AM, relinquishing
the console to JV & Elvis.
O&A are screwed, they can get a 10 share and these annoying embarassments
will surely drag them down 25% with their zero rating.
Why is it that all O&A fans do is make excuses as to why ratings are not
higher, or will not be higher? If you care to remember, and I am sur eyou
don't, Howard was at the same disadvantage, as he usually did end his show
at 10 or half-past-ten, leaving a significant amount of time that received
ratings where he was not under control.
I am just utterly amazed at the amount of excuses coming from O&A fans, and
how they spout about how wonderful the two are doing, and how they are so
much better than Stern, etc., but they always slide in those excuses.
Tim's hardly an O&A fan, and you still seem to be fully free of any
reading comprehension skills.

Try it again, slowly.

I say "Arbitron only rates by dayparts, regardless of the content.
6AM-10AM is a daypart that O&A leave at 9AM."

And then you say "Howard was at the same disadvantage, as he usually
did end his show at 10 or half-past-ten"


Holy fuck. Do you drink a big glass of stupid every morning or what?
Tim Donohoe
2006-07-05 00:44:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Buster
Post by Big Poppy
"My lawyers begged - begged - me not to hire them," Hollander told an
audience at Bear Stearns.
After their first month as replacements for the replacement of Stern -
David Lee Roth - O&A appear to be equaling Howard's final big ratings
with shocking speed.
"appear to be" is the key phrase. Let's see where they are after a year
of ratings books.
BTW... let's not forget that the NY Post hates Stern and will stick it
to him any chance they get.
I think you are mistaken, despite being shunned by Rupert Murdoch when
he tried to do a late night show, Howard has been reading and plugging
the Post for 10 years at least. He used to have that morbidly obese Post
editor on every week also. After his falling out with the fat guy he
still used the Post as his main source of news in the morning. I am
guessing he has some connection to the paper and has a little pull with
the Post.
Loading...