Post by redshirtSure he signs it into law, but if he had vetoed it he'd have been
blasted for "going against the will of the people". After all, if it
Not necessarily. I think Bush is between a rock & a hard place. At
this point, no matter what he does, somebody will see it as "wrong".
Post by redshirtgained enough support to be passed in Congress, then that's the people
speaking, right? He can't go against the will of the people, right?
The problem isn't going against "the will of the people" -- I think we
can find enough instances where Congress passed laws that had little to
do with "the will of the people". Is it the will of the people to have
the income tax structure we have? Are you (or most other people) in
favor of the demise of the original Social Security system as intended,
because it was used/abused to include things that should have been
dealt with in ways other than depleting the Social Security coffers?
But, whether a particular bill is in "the will of the people" or not is
irrelevant to passage. If a president vetoes a bill that Congress
wants, it can be run through Congress again & passed without the
president having any say in the resulting passage.
--
Bill K