Capricorne
2007-07-24 13:12:13 UTC
From today's Washington Post:
Karmazin Makes New XM-Sirius Price Offer
By Kim Hart
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 24, 2007; D01
If the merger between XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio is
approved, the combined company would offer new pricing plans to allow
consumers to pay only for the stations they want, Sirius chief
executive Mel Karmazin said yesterday.
The "a la carte" options are part of Karmazin's latest pitch for the
proposed $4.7 billion merger, which requires approval from both the
Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission. Opponents
of the deal have argued that a merger would raise prices for consumers
by eliminating competition.
The proposed plans would start at $6.99 for 50 stations, or nearly half
the current rate of $12.95 for about 150 stations. For $14.99,
consumers could pick their 100 favorite stations. Both would allow
customers to add channels for 25 cents each. Six other packages would
also be available, including a family-friendly lineup for $11.95, and
News, Sports and Talk for $9.99.
Sirius and XM said their 14 million subscribers would need to order new
radios to take advantage of the new plans, which would be available
within a year of a merger.
The packages may also appeal to FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin, who has
urged cable companies to offer programming on a similar basis. Sirius
and XM plan to file their proposal with the FCC today, which is the
deadline for the companies to respond to public comment on the deal.
"Chairman Martin has always spoken about the consumer benefits of a la
carte pricing," said Mary Diamond, spokeswoman for the FCC's media
bureau.
"No one will pay more than they do today," Karmazin said yesterday at
the National Press Club, adding that the two companies would not be
able to afford the new plans without a merger. He has argued that the
companies already face intense competition from traditional radio,
high-definition radio, Internet radio and portable MP3 players.
But Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of
Broadcasters, the proposed merger's most vocal critic, said
policymakers should not be "hoodwinked" by the proposal. "Two hotly
competitive companies will promise anything to become a monopoly," he
said.
Although some Wall Street analysts recently predicted a favorable
outcome for the merger, it still faces regulatory hurdles. In addition
to winning approvals, the companies must persuade the FCC to overturn a
rule that bars them from combining their airwave licenses. Martin has
indicated that rule could be overturned but has said that a monopoly
must not hurt consumers.
Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union said the proposed packages are an
"enormous breakthrough" for the concept of a la carte packaging. "But,"
he added, "it still doesn't address the fundamental anti-competitive
concerns of the merger."
Karmazin Makes New XM-Sirius Price Offer
By Kim Hart
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 24, 2007; D01
If the merger between XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio is
approved, the combined company would offer new pricing plans to allow
consumers to pay only for the stations they want, Sirius chief
executive Mel Karmazin said yesterday.
The "a la carte" options are part of Karmazin's latest pitch for the
proposed $4.7 billion merger, which requires approval from both the
Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission. Opponents
of the deal have argued that a merger would raise prices for consumers
by eliminating competition.
The proposed plans would start at $6.99 for 50 stations, or nearly half
the current rate of $12.95 for about 150 stations. For $14.99,
consumers could pick their 100 favorite stations. Both would allow
customers to add channels for 25 cents each. Six other packages would
also be available, including a family-friendly lineup for $11.95, and
News, Sports and Talk for $9.99.
Sirius and XM said their 14 million subscribers would need to order new
radios to take advantage of the new plans, which would be available
within a year of a merger.
The packages may also appeal to FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin, who has
urged cable companies to offer programming on a similar basis. Sirius
and XM plan to file their proposal with the FCC today, which is the
deadline for the companies to respond to public comment on the deal.
"Chairman Martin has always spoken about the consumer benefits of a la
carte pricing," said Mary Diamond, spokeswoman for the FCC's media
bureau.
"No one will pay more than they do today," Karmazin said yesterday at
the National Press Club, adding that the two companies would not be
able to afford the new plans without a merger. He has argued that the
companies already face intense competition from traditional radio,
high-definition radio, Internet radio and portable MP3 players.
But Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of
Broadcasters, the proposed merger's most vocal critic, said
policymakers should not be "hoodwinked" by the proposal. "Two hotly
competitive companies will promise anything to become a monopoly," he
said.
Although some Wall Street analysts recently predicted a favorable
outcome for the merger, it still faces regulatory hurdles. In addition
to winning approvals, the companies must persuade the FCC to overturn a
rule that bars them from combining their airwave licenses. Martin has
indicated that rule could be overturned but has said that a monopoly
must not hurt consumers.
Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union said the proposed packages are an
"enormous breakthrough" for the concept of a la carte packaging. "But,"
he added, "it still doesn't address the fundamental anti-competitive
concerns of the merger."